
Art x AI – Tools Don’t Make Taste
Share
When AI first entered the creative space, the conversation was full of fear. Would machines replace artists? Would technology erase originality? I saw it differently. For me, AI was never a replacement—it was a brush, a new tool to paint with.
I began experimenting with AI to generate concepts and reimagine ideas that I couldn’t sketch fast enough. Some results were wild and unusable. Others opened doors I didn’t know existed. The “how” was simple: I let AI act like a collaborator, a sounding board. But the vision? The taste? That was always mine.
Taste can’t be automated. Taste comes from experience, culture, struggle, and perspective. Creative Eiiis was built on taste—the ability to see what others miss, to combine elements in ways that spark emotion. AI just allowed me to move faster, to iterate more, to test boundaries without fear of wasting materials.
The struggle came from critics. “That’s not real art.” “Anyone can do that.” What they didn’t see was the countless hours I spent refining outputs, remixing ideas, and shaping the raw machine suggestions into pieces that matched the Creative Eiiis DNA. It wasn’t about the tool—it was about the vision.
Season 5 carries patterns and experiments that AI helped unlock. They don’t look like what anyone expected, because they weren’t meant to. They’re the product of collaboration between human imagination and machine acceleration. Proof that tools don’t make the creator—vision does.